A CCS wake-up call
28th February 2019
The IPCC 1.5 report has set the tone. We are in a race against time to avoid the dangerous consequences of climate change. Current estimates predict that the world is on the way to 3.0°C. Despite strong scientific evidence, the reality of an open and pragmatic conversation about solving the decarbonisation challenge seems out of reach.
The reality is simple. Net-zero will require a whole variety of measures: low-carbon and renewable energy, decarbonisation of industrial sectors, as well as carbon removal technologies, including carbon capture and storage (CCS). Net-zero means not only decarbonising the electricity system but the whole energy system.
In the road to net-zero, CCS alongside other climate action solutions will be necessary. In the IPCC SR15 Report, three of the four pathways include CCS and bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) as necessary mitigation technologies.
The Paris Agreement calls for a balance between anthropogenic sources and removals by sinks. A unique feature of CCS is that it can manage both the flow- ongoing emissions – and the stock – the atmospheric CO2 concentration. This set of technologies is an important man-made, therefore manageable, emissions sink that can also enable critical future production of energy with a negative carbon footprint.
Despite strong support by internationally respected organisations – including the IPCC, IEA, UK Committee on Climate Change – and while consistently included in climate scenarios – myths and misconceptions continue to cloud CCS discussions in Europe.
Scars also remain from the setbacks of the NER300 and the cancellation of several projects across the continent. For some, CCS is still seen as a fig leaf for the fossil-fuel industry, when in reality it has the ability to support a just transition and the decarbonisation of Europe’s emission-intensive industries, whilst also enabling a new energy economy and job creation through hydrogen production.
This skewed view of CCS has played out in the European Parliament, notably in the context of the COP24 draft resolution and the draft resolution on the EU’s proposed long term strategy for energy and climate change in the environment committee by putting forward language dismissing CCS as a climate mitigation technology.
The renewed interest around CCS, as well as the scepticism around it, proves the need to reframe the discussion. CCS is back on the agenda and it’s here to stay.
A necessary climate technology
The vision for Europe’s long-term climate strategy has created momentum around CCS. The technology is featured as one of the seven building blocks of the Commission’s vision. In the various scenarios put forward in the EU long-term strategy, the contribution of carbon capture ranges from 52 MtCO2 to 606 MtCO2, making a strong case that CCS has a role to play in supporting Europe’s path to a climate neutral economy.
CCS can significantly reduce emissions in energy-intensive industries including cement, petrochemicals and steel. Electrification has its limits. Process emissions from industry also need to be tackled. Both the Energy Transition Commission and Bellona maintain that CCS has a crucial role to play in industrial decarbonisation.
In the cement sector, it is likely to be the only feasible route to completely eliminate process emissions. In steel or chemicals, it may be the most cost-effective route to decarbonisation in places which do not enjoy abundant cheap zero-carbon electricity.
CCS is too often presented as being in opposition to renewables when in reality it has the ability to work hand-in-hand with wind and solar to decarbonise Europe’s energy system.
As renewables continue to grow, electricity grids will have to be equipped to respond quickly to changes in residual load and provide a reliable, dispatchable and flexible source of energy. Clean and dispatchable generation can help future power systems to cope with intermittent generation and effectively meet rising electricity demand.
In power generation, the launch of the NET Power demonstration plant in Texas presents new opportunities to deliver zero-emission electricity. The natural-gas power plant aims to generate emission-free electricity at a competitive cost with conventional combined cycle gas generation.
CCS also opens the door for a new energy economy with the production of hydrogen and the operation of zero-emissions power plants. Hydrogen can play an important role in decarbonising energy production, transport and domestic and industrial heating. Hydrogen from natural gas is a cost-effective and scalable solution. The large-scale production of hydrogen with electrolysis faces the challenge of the generating capacity of renewable energy and with water usage.
A safe and proven climate solution
For some, CCS is a fantasy solution. This is simply untrue. CCS is a proven technology and it has been in commercial operation for over 40 years. In fact, the first CCS project dates back to the 70s. There are currently 43 commercial large-scale CCS facilities around the world: 18 in operation, 5 in construction and 20 in various stages of development.
Europe is currently lagging behind with only two operational projects in Norway (Sleipner and Snøhvit). Despite this lack of progress, there is a wide range of promising CCS projects waiting to be kick-started across Europe.
These include the development of CO2 transport pipelines and storage infrastructure, carbon capture at cement and steel plants, production of low-carbon hydrogen from natural gas, CO2 capture from the waste-to-energy plant and the world’s first hydrogen-fueled power plant.
In the Netherlands, the PORTHOS project aims to develop a CO2 transport and storage infrastructure to decarbonise industry in the Port of Rotterdam. In Norway, the Northern Lights and the full-scale CCS project will develop a pan-European CO2 infrastructure and capture emissions from two industrial sites.
n the Netherlands, there are also plans to decarbonise electricity production by converting Vattenfall’s natural-gas plant into a hydrogen-fueled plant by combining hydrogen production with CCS.
In the UK, the H21 North of England and the HyNet projects are laying important groundwork to use CCS to decarbonise power and heat. The H21 project has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions by over 258 million tonnes a year by 2050.
Action needed to roll-out CCS in Europe
We are at a crucial time. There are thirty-two years left to build a sustainable future for Europe’s economy. The EU and its member states will have to demonstrate how they will successfully and realistically deliver on a net-zero ambition. To achieve the scale and speed of decarbonisation needed, CCS will have a critical role to play.
There are many pioneering CCS projects that can play an important role in supporting Europe’s energy transition. However, these projects are struggling with the lack of robust policy support needed to move forward.
Norway, the first mover, continues to charge ahead. The country has asked for Europe’s support to move ahead with its plans to help kickstart CCS deployment with its full-scale project. This will only be feasible if Norway has access to large quantities of CO2 from other European emitters.
Across Europe, the opposition from some environmental groups and political factions is putting the deployment of CCS at risk. There is a pressing need to move towards a more pragmatic conversation on the energy transition and the decarbonisation challenge.
Given project lead times, it is important to start securing support for CCS projects today. Europe must also learn from past setbacks and see CCS as an opportunity and one of the solutions to the decarbonisation challenge. CCS should no longer be perceived as the ugly duckling of climate mitigation technologies.
The next few months will be crucial for climate discussions in Europe. By early 2020, the EU will have to submit its climate strategy to the UNFCCC. Time has come to be realistic and build a solid foundation for Europe’s climate plan. It’s time for Europe to recognise the value of CCS in supporting the road to net-zero future.
This op-ed was authored by Guloren Turan, General-Manager Advocacy and Communications at the Global CCS Institute. The piece first appeared in Euractiv.