Publications

Resources

Publications

Our publications, reports and research library hosts over 500 specialist reports and research papers on all topics associated with CCS.

View our Publication Library Disclaimer.

Filter by

[ Clear Filtering ]

Carbon dioxide storage in the Clean Development Mechanism: opportunities in Portuguese language countries. Workshop: Lisbon 19-20 September 2013. Final report and future actions
Carbon dioxide storage in the Clean Development Mechanism: opportunities in Portuguese language countries. Workshop: Lisbon 19-20 September 2013. Final report and future actions

20th September 2013

Topic(s): Capacity development, Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage

The first workshop about cooperation on carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) among the community of Portuguese language countries (the CPLP) was held in Lisbon, on the 19th and 20th of September 2013, at the CPLP headquarters. The workshop focused on the dissemination of knowledge about CCS, discussion around the current stage of development of the technology and identification of opportunities for cooperation among the CPLP countries. The programme of the workshop is included in Annex A.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

CCS communications framework appendix: Summarising key findings on induced seismicity
CCS communications framework appendix: Summarising key findings on induced seismicity

20th August 2013

Topic(s): CO2 storage

This report examines whether there is a correlation between CCS and seismicity through a review of key existing literature on the subject. This report is a contribution to the second phase of a project being undertaken for the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute (GCCSI) entitled “Development of Knowledge Sharing Framework for Japan”.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

Authigenic carbonates as natural analogues of mineralisation trapping in CO2 sequestration: a desktop study
Authigenic carbonates as natural analogues of mineralisation trapping in CO2 sequestration: a desktop study

9th August 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage

This project is aimed at supporting CO2 storage projects in Australian sedimentary basins through investigation of the controls on carbonate authigenesis in freshwater aquifers as a natural analogue for mineralisation trapping. The literature review and desktop study provide a foundation that synthesises what is known about the controls on carbonate precipitation in aquifers with different chemistries, reservoir temperatures and available volumes of CO2. The parameters derived from this study will feed into simulations of engineered mineral trapping of injected CO2 that will then be tested experimentally in the laboratory with Precipice and Hutton sandstone core samples.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

Relative permeability analysis to describe multi-phase flow in CO2 storage reservoirs
Relative permeability analysis to describe multi-phase flow in CO2 storage reservoirs

7th August 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage

Relative permeability is one of the most important properties influencing the fate and movement of CO2 in the subsurface. It is a parameter that quantifies the extent to which the injected CO2 and water interfere with each other as they migrate through rocks. Relative permeability measurements are also used directly in all of the mathematical approaches for predicting and matching the fate and movement of CO2 in the subsurface. Consequently, accurate measurements for this important parameter are indispensable.
The purpose of this report is to provide an explanation of the different methods used to measure relative permeability and to provide an objective review of comparable methodologies. The report will also include the identification of data gaps and the requirements to obtain additional material to provide a complete library of relative permeability measurements in varying brine compositions and rock types to represent as complete a suite of potential storage sites as possible.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

Geochemical characterisation of gases, fluids and rocks in the Harvey-1 data well
Geochemical characterisation of gases, fluids and rocks in the Harvey-1 data well

1st August 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage

The Harvey-1 stratigraphic well, drilled in 2012 as a part of the evaluation of the area in South West Western Australia for a suitable carbon storage site, has undergone a geochemical evaluation. Two gas samples from the potential source of CO2 (CSBP and BOC in Kwinana) that may be piped south for a pilot scale test have been analysed and found to contain almost pure CO2, in excess of 98.3 mol.% with little in the way of organic contaminants. The carbon isotopic composition of this gas is 13C -37.6 ± 0.28 ‰, which is quite distinct from other background natural sources of CO2 and might act as a tracer in the future. Oxygen isotope data from the CO2 have been collected to build the database of information that can be used to understand trapping mechanisms and their contribution in the future.

Organic analyses were conducted on a series of core plugs and on some drilling fluids from equivalent depths. Extraction of the core plugs showed that while there was some hydrocarbons present in both the core and drilling fluids, the richest core sample has only a total extractable organic matter content of 304.93 mg/kg rock. The volumes measured were insignificant compared with source rock extracts or amounts seen in sandstone dominated hydrocarbon reservoirs which might contain upwards of 100,000 mg/kg rock. These low volumes indicate that there is no active source rock of quantitative significance in the immediate area of this well and means that there is unlikely to be any form of basin resource conflict in relation to oil or gas finds in the immediate area.

In conclusion, this current geochemical evaluation of the Harvey-1 well has used a combination of standard and novel techniques to show that the geology in this area appears suitable for geological storage of CO2 .

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

Flow assurance & control philosophy:  Rotterdam Opslag en Afvang Demonstratieproject. Special report for the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute
Flow assurance & control philosophy: Rotterdam Opslag en Afvang Demonstratieproject. Special report for the Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute

31st July 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage, CO2 transport, Health safety and environment

One of the key challenges for a large scale CCS demonstration project, like the ROAD project in the Netherlands, is to safely and efficiently operate the CO2 stream of an integrated CCS chain. For ROAD this means: capturing the CO2 from the flue gases of a coal-fired power plant, compressing and transporting the CO2 through a 25 km pipeline to an offshore platform and injecting the CO2 into a depleted gas reservoir 3.5 km below the sea bed.

This special report on the ‘Flow Assurance and Control Philosophy’ of the ROAD project provides an insight into the proposed control and operating systems for the CO2 stream of the integrated CCS chain in steady state, shutdown and start-up conditions.

Although it has not been practiced before, the Flow Assurance Study (FAS) conducted by ROAD has clearly shown that filling a reservoir of (very) low pressure to an end pressure of 300 bar is in practice possible, but one has to study the behaviour of CO2 in all its thermo-dynamic aspects with the parameters of the physical configuration of the transport system.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

The role of storage standards in the deployment of CCS: workshop report
The role of storage standards in the deployment of CCS: workshop report

26th July 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage

The Institute hosted a workshop on 6 June 2013 in Calgary, Alberta, bringing together stakeholders from industry, government, non-government organisations and academia to discuss the role of storage standards in the deployment of CCS. The workshop focused on the implementation of CSA Z741, the standard for the geologic storage of CO2 for Canada and the United States.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

Project Pioneer. Pioneer’s sequestration research and proposed MMV programme: non-confidential report
Project Pioneer. Pioneer’s sequestration research and proposed MMV programme: non-confidential report

23rd July 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage

This report represents the work and results accomplished during the initial phase of work done on Project Pioneer, with respect to sequestering CO2 in a deep geological formation. This report will also discuss some early geological studies (one of which preceded the inception of Pioneer), the drilling and testing of the evaluation well, as well as the detailed geological and reservoir models and the risk analysis that enabled the Project to develop a sequestration and MMV program complete with a cost estimate and schedule.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

Callide Oxyfuel Project: Surat Basin CO2 storage site selection. Part 1: review of Surat Basin CO2 storage options
Callide Oxyfuel Project: Surat Basin CO2 storage site selection. Part 1: review of Surat Basin CO2 storage options

27th June 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage

The overall objective of the report is to present an initial appraisal of a number of potential CO2 storage reservoirs in the Surat basin based on currently proposed EPQs in the Northern (EPQ 7 & 8) and Southern (EPQ 10, 12, 14) Surat Basin areas in the context of large scale CO2 storage (> 1
Mt pa). The report includes the following: 1. Description of the assessment methodology applied. 2. Description of general geology of the areas. 3. Characterisation and ranking of the sites in terms of Social and Environmental factors; access and infrastructure; injectivity, storage capacity, containment. 4. Summary of data in appendices based on various cores and bore holes that are available in the public domain, including stratigraphic profiles, and hydrological data.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

Calgary-US storage standards workshop report
Calgary-US storage standards workshop report

6th June 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage

The Institute hosted a workshop on 6 June 2013 in Calgary, Alberta, bringing together stakeholders from industry, government, non-government organisations and academia to discuss the role of storage standards in the deployment of CCS. The workshop focused on the implementation of CSA Z741, the standard for the geologic storage of CO2 for Canada and the United States.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

大容量の沖合CO2貯留オプションの独立評価
大容量の沖合CO2貯留オプションの独立評価

5th June 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage

ISAのフェーズ3は、商業ベースのCCS大規模普及の後押しとなるべく、大容量沖合貯留の利用可能性に更なる確実性をもたらすとともに、潜在的なCCSプロジェクト開発者に、プロジェクトを遂行した場合の長期的実行可能性についてより大きな信頼感を提供することを目的としている。これらの目的は、オランダ政府による陸上CO2貯留に遅延が生じているため、さらに重要性を増している。

ISAのフェーズ3の実施により、最上部に適切なシーリング層がある、高品質(すなわち、高浸透性)の貯留層すべてについて、地下断層、貯留層の拡張及び厚さ、孔隙マップなどの各データと、オランダ大陸棚(DCS: Dutch Continental Shelf)の地質に関する知識の組合せにより、潜在的な貯留区画を特定した。ISAのフェーズ3で使用したすべての情報源を含むデータベースは、サイト別に分類しており、今後の調査において使用可能である。

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

Case study of the ROAD storage permit
Case study of the ROAD storage permit

1st June 2013

Topic(s): Carbon capture use and storage (CCUS), CO2 storage, Permitting

In June 2013 the ROAD project, as a member of the European CCS Demonstration Project Network, released a case study regarding its storage permit. It gives an overview of the internal ROAD organisation, an overview of the key stakeholders, permitting timelines, and a detailed description of the key issues facing permitting in Europe – including Financial Security requirements, liability and transfer for responsibilities.  It is hoped that the findings will be of interest and help to other project proponents and regulators.

Download


Disclaimer

The content within the Global CCS Institute Publications, Reports and Research Library is provided for information purposes only. We make every effort and take reasonable care to keep the content of this section up-to-date and error-free. However, we make no claim as to its accuracy, currency or reliability.

Content and material featured within this section of our website includes reports and research published by third parties. The content and material may include opinions and recommendations of third parties that do not reflect those held by the Global CCS Institute.

Newsletter

Get the latest CCS updates